CASH Journal applies a peer-review process policy:

1. Author submits the manuscript.
2. Editors check the manuscript with Turnitin. If it passes, internal review decides whether to proceed to peer review stage or not. The manuscripts will be evaluated whether they are in accordance with the focus and scope of CASH Journal. The Manuscripts that are not in accordance will be rejected, but if an adjustment is a possibility the authors may be requested to revise. 
3. Double-blind review with a minimum of two reviewers, in which reviewers do not know who the author(s) is, and the author(s) does not know who the reviewers are. Afterwards, the section editor will request revision and the reviewers' comments are sent anonymously to the authors for them to take the necessary actions and responses.
4. Editor decision. The  Revised manuscript decisions will be evaluated by the appropriate editor, based on reviewers' recommendations, namely: (a) declined, (b) accepted after major revisions, (c) accepted with minor revisions, or (d) accepted. The Editor has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to JOELS Journal should be published.
5. Letter of Acceptance for the Author upon request